Search

Teaching AI to Flag Fraudulent or Incorrect Return Requests in B2B Supply Chains

By Glazix | June 10, 2025

From “never received” to “wrong product”—AI is spotting the return requests that don’t add up before they cost you

In high-volume B2B distribution, not all return requests are created equal. Some are legitimate: wrong SKU shipped, shipment damaged in transit. Others? Less so.

Whether due to internal contractor confusion, clerical mistakes, or deliberate abuse, incorrect or fraudulent return claims are a growing margin leak for ceramics, glass, and specialty building materials distributors.

Now, AI is helping customer service and audit teams flag suspicious return patterns in real time—before inventory is lost or credit is issued.

Common Types of “Bad” Return Requests

Item never received—despite POD confirmation

Wrong item received—but return includes no matching item

Defect claims—with no supporting photos or inconsistent patterns

Over-returning—sending back more units than were shipped

These errors are rarely caught before credit is issued or a replacement is sent.

How AI Spots Return Anomalies

POD & Shipment Verification

AI matches return claims against delivery data, including GPS logs, scanned PODs, and driver notes.

Photo Analysis of Returned Goods

AI scans images of returns to ensure they match the original product—flagging “incomplete” or “incorrect item” attempts.

Customer Pattern Profiling

Frequent returners, inconsistent return-to-order ratios, or returns outside policy windows are automatically flagged.

Quantity Validation

AI compares claimed returns against historical order data, watching for red flags like over-returns or multiple claims per shipment.

Real-World Win: Refractory Materials Distributor

AI was trained on 18 months of returns, flagged 312 suspicious claims. On review:

74 were found to include “phantom” defects

19 were customer-side mix-ups that avoided costly replacement

AI prevented an estimated $112,000 in excess credits over one year

CSRs now use AI flags to trigger polite verification workflows—not accusations—but it changes the outcome.

Implementation Tips

Start by tagging resolved return cases as “valid” or “rejected” to build a training set

Feed the system PODs, invoices, return forms, and email threads for each case

Work cross-functionally: warehouse + CS + finance

Use AI flags to prioritize claim audits—not replace human review

AI can’t make the judgment call for you—but it can tell you which return claims deserve a second look. In a margin-sensitive market, that’s not just nice to have—it’s essential.

You don’t need to distrust your customers. You just need AI to protect your blind spots.


Book A Demo