Search

What Went Wrong with QA/QC Oversights: A Technical Debrief

By Glazix | June 4, 2025

When QA/QC protocols are weakened—whether due to staffing issues, time pressure, or assumption-driven workflows—defects are no longer a possibility; they become inevitable. In glass distribution, where the product must deliver both structurally and visually, one oversight can tarnish a brand.

The Breakdown: Optical Distortion in Oversized IGUs

A distributor delivered oversized IGUs for a tech campus in Canada. Post-installation, building occupants noticed wavy reflections. Inspection revealed roller wave distortion—caused by incorrect tempering parameters at the fabricator’s plant.

The distortion was not flagged during the internal QA check because panels were inspected under warehouse lighting, not natural daylight conditions.

Key Failures

No simulation of installed conditions during QA review.

Lack of training on acceptable distortion thresholds for large-format units.

QA signoffs were rushed to meet a crane lift deadline.

Impact

Over $100,000 in refabrication and reinstallation.

Negative press coverage about “visual design flaws” in a flagship campus.

Audit triggered by the architect across all pending distributor projects.

Prevention Tactics

Establish a dedicated QA tier for design-sensitive glass types.

Standardize natural light inspection protocols for vision-critical units.

Partner with fabricators on QA alignment documents for large custom orders.

QA/QC is not a final step—it’s a design safeguard. Distributors that treat quality oversight as a strategic advantage will protect both project and reputation.


Book A Demo